TechCrunch should stay out of economics

-
I was startled when I read Warren Buffet's Op-Ed piece in the NYT.. He basically burned down the GOP/Fox News "Job-creators can't be taxed" house of cards narrative. Buffet definitely has the cred to state how investors and businesses have been operating over the years. Investment during times with higher taxes like the 80s and 90s led to a Lot of people getting rich, people created jobs and grew businesses. There are some of the lowest taxes on the wealthy right now, and there definitely aren't a lot of jobs being created. Sounded like straight talk. Then a ridiculous piece by Michael Arrington of TechCrunch nearly dropped me out of my seat. One of those pieces where you're waiting for the sarcastic punch-line only to find out that the writer was serious.

Arrington states that Buffet's true motive is to keep others from getting rich. He don't like the "New Money". Otherwise he would've proposed a different tax which would hit him harder.Therefore it must be to prevent other people from getting rich. Does Buffet worry that he won't get a good parking spot at the country club? The man volunteers to pay more taxes and yet he says "no thanks, we don't think your motives are pure enough". There's nothing to state that Buffet is against a wealth tax. He simply refuted the current narrative that taxing the rich I mean "job-creators" will hurt the economy's growth.

What's more fair a wealth tax or increased taxes on dividends and capital gains? I don't know. But just because you disagree doesn't give you the right to fabricate a motive.

Comments

David said…
Yeah i read that article too, but the thing with Arrington is he often publishes articles that are purposely inflammatory because it drives traffic. Take him with a grain of salt.
August 18, 2011 at 3:22 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

de-cluttter

-
it really is amazing what you can do without when you must. Our home is going up on the market so the agent came by and suggested that we cleanup. Now our place is not dirty, my wife would never let that happen. All the sweaters you don't wear,But might want to; extra dishes, utensils, printed articles you intend to read... should we throw them out? doesn't that just increase waste, where we might print/buy it again later on when we Do need it? Perhaps we need to examine how we managed without it and just continue. Or if it's aspiration-based clutter just give ourselves a reasonable deadline to put it into practice. The idea of aspirational clutter is one that hits home. Things that you don't use, but embody qualities that you aspire for yourself. A treadmill doubling as a clothes hanger; one day you will get in shape. Books you've never read that fill shelves; the budding philosopher that never bloomed. The extra server, more of a footrest than anything; the proje...
Read more

watt is in the bag?

-
I was at my local library yesterday picking up some reading material. I went to the check-out desk and found a a small stand from the power company. There were about two dozen packages. Within each package was $$$ http://tinyurl.com/2tg6x6 What a fantastic idea on multiple fronts. The campaign to conserve energy is all well and good but you need to enable people to understand their drain on the system their footprint etc. I've seen many sites on calculating offsets but that was estimation and felt more like guesswork. This watt reader allows you to plug any device into the wattreader which plugs directly into the wall. From there the reader will let you know exactly how much current is being drawn. This will allow you to understand the phantom load of many common devices. A great application to help people better understand their footprint, and how much it costs them on a daily basis.
Read more